We’ve seen this
playbook before

This is a pattern, not a one-off

✽

Cleared, then stalled
Just down the road, 194 Marion Street was approved, cleared, and then paused for years while seeking more height.
✽

Asking for more
The developer is now trying to add more storeys — a common tactic once rezoning is locked in.
✽

Still vacant
Years later, no homes have been delivered and the site sits unused. The community gets nothing.
Much like 138–152 Victoria Road, Rozelle. Left vacant whilst an additional 4 storeys were sought post approval.
✽

A familiar strategy
Rezone first, promise benefits, then delay and reshape the proposal later. It happens all the time.
✽

Community sidelined
After rezoning, it becomes much harder for residents to object — and changes often happen without notice.
✽

This is our real chance
If we don’t raise concerns now, we may not get another meaningful opportunity to influence what gets built.

Make your offical objection today

That site was rezoned, cleared, and left vacant. The developer later returned asking for more height. It remains undeveloped, despite being approved years ago.
Yes. Once land is rezoned, it’s common for developers to push for even more through amended DA submissions. Community power is significantly reduced.
It’s when the project expands beyond what was originally promised — more height, more units, less public benefit — often after the initial approval has been secured.
Not directly. The site was not included in Stage 1 and sits outside the designated uplift corridors. Even the developer’s own report admits it doesn’t align with PRCUTS goals.
Because rezoning is the key moment. After that, the controls change, and it's much harder to challenge height, density, or land use.